Sistivity anomalies e3 and e5/G5 are placed in an intermediate position between the feature “B” as well as the excavated tomb Eb1/G4. As a consequence, their belonging to one or the other may well be questioned and can only be clarified by means of a focused archeological excavation.Appl. Sci. 2021, 11,16 ofFigure 11. Place map of the recovered anomalies. (a) Orthophoto of your survey location with all the location of your whole set of recovered geophysical and geochemical anomalies. Solidred crosses indicate the position of the anomalies as mapped from all applied techniques, although yellow and white crosses locate the anomalies as recovered from two/three and a single single process, respectively. Strong and Bongkrekic acid MedChemExpress dashedorange rectangles show the interpreted burial structures organization. (b) DSM derived by StructurefromMotion photogrammetry superimposed on the CCR profiles inside a 3D viewpoint.five. Conclusions This study presents the key results obtained by means of an integrated geophysical and geochemical survey at Vigna la Piazza necropolis aimed to find unidentified archeological burials. The effectiveness from the integration amongst common highresolution geophysical approaches applied to archaeological prospection was completed by the novelty from the joint use of Rn in soil measurements and CCR. The obtained results combining data from different methods showed superior correlation and permitted us to make a map of achievable archeological structures. The principle DMT-dC(ac) Phosphoramidite Biological Activity limitations with the CCR method were found to become as follows: (i) rough resolution of targets, (ii) low resolution within the uppermost meter of soil, and (iii) possible mismatching within the target dimension and position because of uncertaintyAppl. Sci. 2021, 11,17 ofin the distribution of measurements along the survey line. Nevertheless, our practical experience in this study led us to consider the CCR method a really helpful tool for a preliminary site investigation. Combining CCR and GPR grids, it is actually attainable to obtain a deeper 3D vision of buried archaeological structures, covering massive regions in a reasonably short time. The determination with the Th/Rn ratio offered helpful info to point out zones characterized by the presence of shallow empty or partially empty cavities. Since several necropolises and acropolises in central Italy had been constructed with and within tuff components, the Rn in soil measurements can be effectively applied. Ultimately, this paper suggests that Rn and CCR procedures may very well be thought of dependable tools for the preliminary investigation of such archaeological targets inside a equivalent geological context, plus the results will deliver archaeologists with guidance on future archeological excavations.Author Contributions: V.S.: Conceptualization, information curation, and writingoriginal draft preparation; V.M. and F.F.: investigation, formal evaluation, visualization, and writingreview and editing; M.M. and M.F.M.: supervision, validation, and writingreview and editing; A.G. and N.V.: data acquisition, methodology, and writingoriginal draft preparation; F.G., R.C., and L.M.: investigation; S.U.: investigation, information curation, and writingoriginal draft preparation. All authors have study and agreed for the published version on the manuscript. Funding: This research received no external funding. Institutional Assessment Board Statement: Not applicable. Informed Consent Statement: Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient(s) to publish this paper if applicable. Data Availability Statement: The data presented in this study are openly.
