Al.pone.0056141.gNotch1 in Human BIBS39 manufacturer Esophageal Squamous Cell CancerFigure 6. Variable Notch1 and Hes1 expressions revealed in the tissue microarray sections. Upper panel is for Notch1 expression and lower panel is for Hes-1 expression. All images were taken at 200 x. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056141.gtreatments. In normoxia condition elevated levels of 5-FU sensitivity were repeatedly shown in the Notch1 specific siRNA treated cells (Figure 5B), compared to the Notch1 non-specific siRNA treated control cells (p = 0.004). Similarly cultivated in 1 O2 significantly higher levels of 5-FU sensitivity were observed in the Notch1 specific siRNA treated cells (Figure 5C, p = 0.004).survival analyses of the patients with 10 years follow-up show a significantly shorter clinical outcome for patients with higher levels of Notch1 expression(Figure 9, p = 0.001), but not with Hes-1 expression.DiscussionWe have confirmed the Notch1 expression in the morphologically aggressive KYSE70 human esophagus squamous cancer cell line by both Q-PCR and Western 57773-63-4 blotting, and its expression is inducible in hypoxia condition. However, the Notch1 protein expression was confirmed negative in the KYSE450 cells and weakly positive in the KYSE140 cells, although Notch1 RNA expressed in a similar level in these three cancer cell lines. Sequencing of the RT-PCR products of Notch1 in both the KYSE70 and KYSE450 cells with two Notch1 specific primer pairs disclosed neither mutation nor deletion, indicating possible post-transcriptional regulations of Notch1 in the KYSE450 cells. Further study revealed that the KYSE70 cell line tolerated hypoxia treatment better than the KYSE450 cell line as shown in Figure 2. In consistent with our previous study in prostate cancer cells with greater stemness in response to hypoxia[26], both KYSE70 and KYSE450 esophagus cancer cell lines were responding to hypoxia by upregulation of the stemness factors Oct3/4 and Sox2. Next, we decided to ask whether the cells’ 5-FU chemotherapy sensitivity was reduced in hypoxia condition. Our results showed that both cell lines were more resistant to the 5-FU treatment in hypoxia than in normoxia. However, we discovered that the KYSE70 cells showed significantly higher 5-FU resistance under both normoxia and hypoxia than the KYSE450 cells did. This led us to speculate whether Notch1 might have some role in this 5-FU resistance difference, since the major difference of 18325633 these two cell lines is their Notch1 expression. Although other protein expression differences in these two cell lines like Hif-1a and Hes-1 were discovered, only Notch1 expression was verified always negative in the KYSE450 cells, and always strong positive in the KYSE70 cells. Therefore we performed additional 5-FU sensitivity experNotch1 expression is significantly associated with poor clinical outcomeImmunohistochemical screening of the tissue microarray sections revealed variable Notch1 (Figure 6, upper panel) and Her-1 expressions (Figure 6, lower panel). To closely examine their expression status in these samples, large paraffin sections were applied for additional immunohistochemistry. As shown in Figure 7, Notch1 protein expression could be revealed in the ten normal epithelia adjacent to tumors. In these normal epithelia positive reaction was mainly localized in the membrane and cytoplasm of the basal cells. In the tumor samples, rather homogeneous staining could be seen in the poorly differentiated tumors, while the well different.Al.pone.0056141.gNotch1 in Human Esophageal Squamous Cell CancerFigure 6. Variable Notch1 and Hes1 expressions revealed in the tissue microarray sections. Upper panel is for Notch1 expression and lower panel is for Hes-1 expression. All images were taken at 200 x. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056141.gtreatments. In normoxia condition elevated levels of 5-FU sensitivity were repeatedly shown in the Notch1 specific siRNA treated cells (Figure 5B), compared to the Notch1 non-specific siRNA treated control cells (p = 0.004). Similarly cultivated in 1 O2 significantly higher levels of 5-FU sensitivity were observed in the Notch1 specific siRNA treated cells (Figure 5C, p = 0.004).survival analyses of the patients with 10 years follow-up show a significantly shorter clinical outcome for patients with higher levels of Notch1 expression(Figure 9, p = 0.001), but not with Hes-1 expression.DiscussionWe have confirmed the Notch1 expression in the morphologically aggressive KYSE70 human esophagus squamous cancer cell line by both Q-PCR and Western blotting, and its expression is inducible in hypoxia condition. However, the Notch1 protein expression was confirmed negative in the KYSE450 cells and weakly positive in the KYSE140 cells, although Notch1 RNA expressed in a similar level in these three cancer cell lines. Sequencing of the RT-PCR products of Notch1 in both the KYSE70 and KYSE450 cells with two Notch1 specific primer pairs disclosed neither mutation nor deletion, indicating possible post-transcriptional regulations of Notch1 in the KYSE450 cells. Further study revealed that the KYSE70 cell line tolerated hypoxia treatment better than the KYSE450 cell line as shown in Figure 2. In consistent with our previous study in prostate cancer cells with greater stemness in response to hypoxia[26], both KYSE70 and KYSE450 esophagus cancer cell lines were responding to hypoxia by upregulation of the stemness factors Oct3/4 and Sox2. Next, we decided to ask whether the cells’ 5-FU chemotherapy sensitivity was reduced in hypoxia condition. Our results showed that both cell lines were more resistant to the 5-FU treatment in hypoxia than in normoxia. However, we discovered that the KYSE70 cells showed significantly higher 5-FU resistance under both normoxia and hypoxia than the KYSE450 cells did. This led us to speculate whether Notch1 might have some role in this 5-FU resistance difference, since the major difference of 18325633 these two cell lines is their Notch1 expression. Although other protein expression differences in these two cell lines like Hif-1a and Hes-1 were discovered, only Notch1 expression was verified always negative in the KYSE450 cells, and always strong positive in the KYSE70 cells. Therefore we performed additional 5-FU sensitivity experNotch1 expression is significantly associated with poor clinical outcomeImmunohistochemical screening of the tissue microarray sections revealed variable Notch1 (Figure 6, upper panel) and Her-1 expressions (Figure 6, lower panel). To closely examine their expression status in these samples, large paraffin sections were applied for additional immunohistochemistry. As shown in Figure 7, Notch1 protein expression could be revealed in the ten normal epithelia adjacent to tumors. In these normal epithelia positive reaction was mainly localized in the membrane and cytoplasm of the basal cells. In the tumor samples, rather homogeneous staining could be seen in the poorly differentiated tumors, while the well different.
