En Finland and Russia. We’ve got undertaken study NG-012 Purity & Documentation inside the border area for more than twenty years, collectively and separately, and have developed a conceptualization of the intersection of bordering and gender in our previous articles (e.g., Davydova and P l en 2010; Davydova-Minguet and P l en 2017). We’re specifically considering gendered everyday practices for example transnational care and preserving household relations which are recognized as standard fields of women’s “small” agency (Jokinen 2015; Zechner 2010). Because of this the principle body of our data is constituted by the interviews with ladies. On top of that, girls form the majority of Russian-speaking immigrants in Finland and particularly in the studied Eastern border area. The body of our data consists with the field diaries from the long-term (participatory) observations of transnational everyday lives inside the border region and dozens of semi-structural and biographical interviews with neighborhood Finnish- and Russian-speaking dwellers. We also use ourselves as instruments of analysis following the tips of autoethnography (Uotinen 2010; Davydova-Minguet and P l en 2017). On the other hand, we based this article largely on the data gathered throughout our two most recent projects: Perceptions of Russia across Eurasia: Memory, Identity, Conflicts (2015017); and Multilayered Borders of International Safety (2017019). Inside these two projects, furthermore to extensive participatory observations, 21 Russian-speaking informants were interviewed, 16 of which were girls. Furthermore, two interviews had been created in 2020 in our ongoing project on historical memory in Russian-Finnish borderlands. We also employed some interviews performed about two decades ago for our doctoral research (see Davydova 2009; P l en 2013). In seeing ethnographyGenealogy 2021, 5,6 ofas a long-term improvisational practice (see Malkki 2008), and with regards to data gathering and analysing, we claim that researchers require to open gates in diverse directions and use unique materials and methodological tools, as this is the only strategy to conduct holistic analyses of such a blurred phenomenon as transnational family members relations within the tense Finnish-Russian border region. We also set the constructed figures within the context of preceding study and memoir literature. We hence aim to Amidepsine D Autophagy location our material within a dialogue using a broader historical context. Given the multifarious nature with the data, we present our analysis experientially. To strategy the data evaluation ethnographically inside the most attentive way, we have constructed the figures of “Aili” and “Vera”, who represent distinctive themes and aspects on the analysed phenomena in diverse historical periods. These themes are, i.a., the history of migration, everyday life in Finland and in the Soviet Union or/and Russia, transnational loved ones relations and care, as well as transnational media involvement. The figure of “Aili” represents the affective precarity of transnational familyhood in the Soviet era, whereas “Vera” respectively embodies the fragility of transnational familyhood in post-Soviet context. These figures are based on our empirical data, despite the fact that it need to be noted that the actual conditions of our person informants do not consistently match into these two figures. The scenarios of a few of the informants might be portrayed with all the assistance of each figures, while some match only partly into among the stories. The stories aim at a clarification on the central elements of transnational familyhood in the Finnis.
