Ng MS023 msds Stattic site frequency (Fig. 5C), this was accompanied by decreased AHParea (baseline: 1141 ?303 ms mV; niflumic acid: 480 ?131 ms mV; n = 15, P < 0.05). Finally, in a subset of neurons, the impulse train was followed by an afterdepolarization (ADP; Fig. 2C), which in other neural tissues contributes to generation of burst firing (Brumberg et al. 2000; Su et al. 2001; Lancaster et al. 2002). In our sensory neuron recordings, an ADP after a train was observed in Ai neurons after injury (Control 0/55; SNL4 3/26 (12 ), P = 0.04 vs. Control; SNL5 12/40 (30 ), P < 0.001 vs. Control), and in Ao neurons independent of injury at an overall rate of 8 (13/163). However, the presence of an ADP had no effect on following frequency (without ADP, 348 ?12 Hz; with ADP, 353 ?45 Hz). Thus, the AHP and ADP have minimal direct influence upon conduction through the T-junction. Alternatively, Ca2+ -activated channel opening might influence propagation failure by causing a progressive shift in the baseline V m during the train (Debanne et al. 2011). Each AP is initiated during the AHP from the preceding pulse (Fig. 2), so we characterized the cumulative effect of this phenomenon by comparing the somatic V m at the moment of AP initiation (which we termedthe aRMP) for the second and the last APs in the train. Most Control neurons (Ai : 26/40, 65 ; Ao : 56/72, 78 ) showed a pattern in which the aRMP became progressively more depolarized (Figs 2A and 7). We considered whether this pattern could result from summation of ADPs (Sanchez-Vives Gallego, 1994). However, only very few neurons (4 Ai , 8 Ao , of 292 neurons, 4 ) showed an ADP following a single AP, so the depolarizing patterns observed in most neurons during trains evolved in the absence of a single AP ADP. Nerve injury had no effect on the average change of aRMP during trains (Fig. 7), although a depolarizing pattern was less common in Ao neurons after injury (10/21, 48 ; P = 0.01 vs. Control). Before considering whether changing aRMP during the train contributes to propagation failure, we note that contrasting data were reported by Amir Devor (1997), who found that the progressive RMP shift during trains of APs produced by direct somatic stimulation was in the hyperpolarizing direction for 90 of DRG neurons, rather than depolarizing as we found. Because that study employed prolonged stimulation (10 s), we tested additional Control neurons to determine whether hyperpolarization might eventually predominate if stimulation (axonal) is extended for 10 s. Of these 16 neurons, 15 (94 ) showed a depolarizing shift during prolonged stimulation at following frequency. This indicates that our findings are not specific for a particular duration of stimulation. A more relevant factor may be the firing rate during the train, which was generally slower in the work by Amir and Devor than in the present report, in which we focused on the maximal following frequency. The aRMP is set by the amplitude of the precedingFigure 6. Superimposed AHPs following trains composed of from 1 to 20 action potentials (APs) in two different neurons In one (A), the amplitude of the fast AHP shows progressive decrement, concurrent with the development of a slower AHP component with greater number of preceding APs. Other neurons, such as that shown in B, show a progressive decrease of the fast component amplitude and its eventual disappearance, along with the development of a slower component. The AHP will influence the membrane voltage at w.Ng frequency (Fig. 5C), this was accompanied by decreased AHParea (baseline: 1141 ?303 ms mV; niflumic acid: 480 ?131 ms mV; n = 15, P < 0.05). Finally, in a subset of neurons, the impulse train was followed by an afterdepolarization (ADP; Fig. 2C), which in other neural tissues contributes to generation of burst firing (Brumberg et al. 2000; Su et al. 2001; Lancaster et al. 2002). In our sensory neuron recordings, an ADP after a train was observed in Ai neurons after injury (Control 0/55; SNL4 3/26 (12 ), P = 0.04 vs. Control; SNL5 12/40 (30 ), P < 0.001 vs. Control), and in Ao neurons independent of injury at an overall rate of 8 (13/163). However, the presence of an ADP had no effect on following frequency (without ADP, 348 ?12 Hz; with ADP, 353 ?45 Hz). Thus, the AHP and ADP have minimal direct influence upon conduction through the T-junction. Alternatively, Ca2+ -activated channel opening might influence propagation failure by causing a progressive shift in the baseline V m during the train (Debanne et al. 2011). Each AP is initiated during the AHP from the preceding pulse (Fig. 2), so we characterized the cumulative effect of this phenomenon by comparing the somatic V m at the moment of AP initiation (which we termedthe aRMP) for the second and the last APs in the train. Most Control neurons (Ai : 26/40, 65 ; Ao : 56/72, 78 ) showed a pattern in which the aRMP became progressively more depolarized (Figs 2A and 7). We considered whether this pattern could result from summation of ADPs (Sanchez-Vives Gallego, 1994). However, only very few neurons (4 Ai , 8 Ao , of 292 neurons, 4 ) showed an ADP following a single AP, so the depolarizing patterns observed in most neurons during trains evolved in the absence of a single AP ADP. Nerve injury had no effect on the average change of aRMP during trains (Fig. 7), although a depolarizing pattern was less common in Ao neurons after injury (10/21, 48 ; P = 0.01 vs. Control). Before considering whether changing aRMP during the train contributes to propagation failure, we note that contrasting data were reported by Amir Devor (1997), who found that the progressive RMP shift during trains of APs produced by direct somatic stimulation was in the hyperpolarizing direction for 90 of DRG neurons, rather than depolarizing as we found. Because that study employed prolonged stimulation (10 s), we tested additional Control neurons to determine whether hyperpolarization might eventually predominate if stimulation (axonal) is extended for 10 s. Of these 16 neurons, 15 (94 ) showed a depolarizing shift during prolonged stimulation at following frequency. This indicates that our findings are not specific for a particular duration of stimulation. A more relevant factor may be the firing rate during the train, which was generally slower in the work by Amir and Devor than in the present report, in which we focused on the maximal following frequency. The aRMP is set by the amplitude of the precedingFigure 6. Superimposed AHPs following trains composed of from 1 to 20 action potentials (APs) in two different neurons In one (A), the amplitude of the fast AHP shows progressive decrement, concurrent with the development of a slower AHP component with greater number of preceding APs. Other neurons, such as that shown in B, show a progressive decrease of the fast component amplitude and its eventual disappearance, along with the development of a slower component. The AHP will influence the membrane voltage at w.
