Ned as SP600125 structure two-sided buy ABT-737 p-value<0.05 and Bonferroni corrections were applied for multiple comparisons when appropriate.PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0122037 March 27,5 /A Live Cell Based Assay for Detection of NMDAR AntibodiesResults Expression of functional NMDARExpression of NMDAR subunits NR1, NR2A and NR2B was verified by staining with antibodies specific for the respective subunit (S1 Fig). We found an optimal distribution of each subunit by using a molar ratio of NR1-EmGFP:2A:2B-GFP of 3:1:1. The overall transfection efficiencies as detected by flow cytometry were 84? and 93? for NMDAR-(Em)GFP and CD2-EmGFP, respectively. Survival and transfection rates of NMDAR overexpressing cells increased in a dose-dependent manner in the presence of the uncompetitive NMDAR antagonist (+)-MK-801, indicating the presence of functional NMDAR (S2 Fig).Detection of NMDAR antibodies in the discovery groupFig 1 shows the typical antigen distribution of HEK293A cells overexpressing NMDAR tagged with green fluorescent proteins and the staining pattern with serum IgG of an NMDAR encephalitis patient at low magnification and higher magnification using a confocal microscope. It clearly shows the colocalization of membrane-associated NMDAR with serum antibodies of the patient but no colocalization with intracellular NMDAR probably residing within the endoplasmic reticulum (Fig 1B). Internalization of NMDAR in response to antibody binding observed in some but not all cells in the live CBA is shown in Fig 1C. With the CBA, in the discovery group NMDAR antibodies were detected in 7/7 (100 ) patients with NMDAR encephalitis, 0/37 (0 ) neurological controls and 0/32 (0 ) healthy controls (Table 1). Sensitivity and specificity of the CBA were 100 (95 confidence intervals (CI) 59.0?00.0 and 94.8?00.0, respectively). Antibody titers in NMDAR encephalitis patients ranged from 1:640 to 1:20,480 (median 1:1,280) (Fig 2A). For the FACS based assay, gating and analysis strategy for NMDAR-(Em)GFP and CD2-EmGFP expressing cells is shown in Fig 3. In the discovery group the MFI was significantly higher in NMDAR patients (median 74,938, range 7,681 to 237,432) compared to neurological controls (median -401, range -16,158 to 16,646) and healthy controls (median 1,076, range -6,701 to 16,269; Fig 2B). Using ROC analysis a cut-off MFI value of 20,700 was determined (area under the curve 0.988, p<0.0001). NMDAR antibodies were detected in 6/7 (86 ) NMDAR encephalitis patients, 0/37 (0 ) neurological and 0/32 (0 ) healthy controls (Table 1). Therefore, with a specificity of 100 (95 CI 94.8?00.0) the FACS based assay had a sensitivity of 86 (95 CI 42.1?9.6). Intra- and inter-assay variations (coefficient of variation) were 6 and 22?5 , respectively.Detection of NMDAR antibodies in the validation groupIn a next step the CBA was applied to 32 blinded samples of the validation group from Barcelona. All 16 patients with NMDAR encephalitis were positive for NMDAR antibodies and all 16 neurological controls were seronegative (Table 1). Antibody titers in NMDAR encephalitis patients ranged from 1:80 to 1:2,560 (median 1:640) (Fig 4A). Thus, the sensitivity and specificity of the CBA of 100 were confirmed in these blinded samples (95 CI 79.4?00.0). Likewise, the FACS assay was applied to 32 blinded samples of the validation group from Barcelona. 14/16 patients with NMDAR encephalitis (87 ) were positive for NMDAR antibodies using the cut-off value determined in the discovery.Ned as two-sided p-value<0.05 and Bonferroni corrections were applied for multiple comparisons when appropriate.PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0122037 March 27,5 /A Live Cell Based Assay for Detection of NMDAR AntibodiesResults Expression of functional NMDARExpression of NMDAR subunits NR1, NR2A and NR2B was verified by staining with antibodies specific for the respective subunit (S1 Fig). We found an optimal distribution of each subunit by using a molar ratio of NR1-EmGFP:2A:2B-GFP of 3:1:1. The overall transfection efficiencies as detected by flow cytometry were 84? and 93? for NMDAR-(Em)GFP and CD2-EmGFP, respectively. Survival and transfection rates of NMDAR overexpressing cells increased in a dose-dependent manner in the presence of the uncompetitive NMDAR antagonist (+)-MK-801, indicating the presence of functional NMDAR (S2 Fig).Detection of NMDAR antibodies in the discovery groupFig 1 shows the typical antigen distribution of HEK293A cells overexpressing NMDAR tagged with green fluorescent proteins and the staining pattern with serum IgG of an NMDAR encephalitis patient at low magnification and higher magnification using a confocal microscope. It clearly shows the colocalization of membrane-associated NMDAR with serum antibodies of the patient but no colocalization with intracellular NMDAR probably residing within the endoplasmic reticulum (Fig 1B). Internalization of NMDAR in response to antibody binding observed in some but not all cells in the live CBA is shown in Fig 1C. With the CBA, in the discovery group NMDAR antibodies were detected in 7/7 (100 ) patients with NMDAR encephalitis, 0/37 (0 ) neurological controls and 0/32 (0 ) healthy controls (Table 1). Sensitivity and specificity of the CBA were 100 (95 confidence intervals (CI) 59.0?00.0 and 94.8?00.0, respectively). Antibody titers in NMDAR encephalitis patients ranged from 1:640 to 1:20,480 (median 1:1,280) (Fig 2A). For the FACS based assay, gating and analysis strategy for NMDAR-(Em)GFP and CD2-EmGFP expressing cells is shown in Fig 3. In the discovery group the MFI was significantly higher in NMDAR patients (median 74,938, range 7,681 to 237,432) compared to neurological controls (median -401, range -16,158 to 16,646) and healthy controls (median 1,076, range -6,701 to 16,269; Fig 2B). Using ROC analysis a cut-off MFI value of 20,700 was determined (area under the curve 0.988, p<0.0001). NMDAR antibodies were detected in 6/7 (86 ) NMDAR encephalitis patients, 0/37 (0 ) neurological and 0/32 (0 ) healthy controls (Table 1). Therefore, with a specificity of 100 (95 CI 94.8?00.0) the FACS based assay had a sensitivity of 86 (95 CI 42.1?9.6). Intra- and inter-assay variations (coefficient of variation) were 6 and 22?5 , respectively.Detection of NMDAR antibodies in the validation groupIn a next step the CBA was applied to 32 blinded samples of the validation group from Barcelona. All 16 patients with NMDAR encephalitis were positive for NMDAR antibodies and all 16 neurological controls were seronegative (Table 1). Antibody titers in NMDAR encephalitis patients ranged from 1:80 to 1:2,560 (median 1:640) (Fig 4A). Thus, the sensitivity and specificity of the CBA of 100 were confirmed in these blinded samples (95 CI 79.4?00.0). Likewise, the FACS assay was applied to 32 blinded samples of the validation group from Barcelona. 14/16 patients with NMDAR encephalitis (87 ) were positive for NMDAR antibodies using the cut-off value determined in the discovery.
